One trainer in this subject makes the very valid point that an assembly house doesn’t make circuits or assemblies, because it buys in components and PCBs; all that an assembler ‘makes’ is solder joints! Solder joints are therefore crucially important, because the integrity of the whole assembly rests on the quality of these connections.
Inevitably, because other units have dealt at some length with solder, the focus now will turn to fluxes and the importance of correct wetting.
Soldering has been defined as a ‘thermic process for the permanent joining and coating of materials, whereby a liquid phase is introduced either by means of melting a solder (melting soldering) or by means of diffusion on the surface (diffusion soldering)’.
Printed circuit assembly processes are melting soldering and fall into three categories.
Of these processes, the second is currently the most important, reflow soldering having displaced wave soldering for many applications, particularly with high density assemblies.
In pin-through-hole technology, the surfaces to be soldered are held together mechanically before soldering by a method such as ‘clinching’ the leads. Applying solder forms an electrical joint, although it also strengthens the mechanical attachment.
In surface mount technology, the mechanical interconnection is actually made by the solder: unless chip-attach adhesive (‘glue’) has also been used, the solder forms the only permanent joint between component and board.
Partly because the through-hole component already has some mechanical attachment, but mostly because the solder joints are substantially more robust in design, with contact made to the leads throughout the depth of the hole, through-hole connections are substantially stronger than they need to be. Some sources would claim that they are x10 over-designed. The surface mount solder joint, by contrast, has a much smaller margin of safety. As we will find when studying Failure mechanisms, the reliability of a joint depends on the volume of the solder available to absorb the inevitable strains. Insufficient solder equates to insufficient long-term strength, and increases the potential for failure.
Before you read further, write down what you think a good joint is. And then what you think what makes a good joint.
Compare your answers with the comments in the sections that follow.
What is a good joint? Visual standards of quality are notoriously difficult to define, although practised inspectors have an intuitive feel for what is a ‘good soldered joint’, that is one which will perform both its mechanical and electrical functions without failure. However, it is generally agreed that, irrespective of the way in which the joints are made:
Solder should flow evenly over the surfaces to be soldered and run out thinly towards the edges of the joint, with a contact angle a <<30° (Figure 1), unless the solder fillet is small and the contact angle constrained by the closeness of the edge of the solder land, as may be the case with small SM components.
The solder should ideally wet the entire periphery of the termination to be soldered, and the thickness of the joint should increase evenly from the pad boundary to the termination: this presence of a ‘fillet’ helps confirm that the solder volume has been determined by joint geometry and surface tension and not constrained by undesirable factors.
There is a wide range in acceptable solder volumes, depending to a great extent on whether a SM joint has been reflowed or wave-soldered. However, a balance must be sought between sufficiency and excess!
Generally accepted criteria for solder adequacy are that:
Apart from minor irregularities, the surface of the solder should be uninterrupted and smooth, and near-eutectic tin-lead solders are generally uniformly shiny in appearance. However, where components have metallisation which dissolves in solder (such as some capacitors) small irregularities in surface finish are acceptable.
IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies has been developed to reflect what is generally regarded as good practice for a very wide range of electronic assemblies. This standard often forms the basis of in-house specifications.
‘What makes a good joint?’ is an even harder question to answer than ‘What is a good joint?’. Our ideas about this have been condensed into Figure 2, and we shall be considering some of these issues later in the module.
[ back to top ]
In order to understand the ‘melting soldering’ process, we have to consider:
In Metal basics we showed the stages in metal solidification, and introduced the idea of the phase diagram for the tin-lead alloys which are the main solders currently in use. Then in Solder materials we revisited the phase diagram for tin-lead, and looked at the structure of a solidified solder joint.
However, whilst Solder paste basics makes reference to the flux vehicle, there is very little explanation about the process of wetting or the use of fluxes. In the sections which follow, we will be attempting to explain the process of solder wetting, and discussing the various types of flux used. We will be doing this in a more practical context than in Viscosity and flow, but if you don’t recall the discussion on the spreading of droplets, capillary action and contact angles, now would be a good time to re-read that section.
As the temperature rises, the flux melts and begins to interact with the metal surface, removing or displacing oxides, and preparing a ‘clean’ metal surface for the solder. As this is happening, the solder particles in the paste begin to melt at the hottest spots, replacing the flux and wetting the clean surfaces. This wetting action results in the wicking of the solder onto the hottest and cleanest metal surfaces.
The speed of the action depends on:
Under most conditions, temperature non-uniformity is the major factor dictating the wetting time for the assembly as a whole. It is normally recommended that the heat source should be 25–40°C above the liquidus temperature to assure complete melting of the solder and good bond formation.
After all the solder particles have melted, a liquid solder ‘volume’ forms. The surface tension acting to minimise surface area then prevents further wicking action, helps hold the solder in place, and bridges gaps between lead and substrate, forming a fillet upon cool-down. The resultant fillet shape and joint strength depend on how much solder was available, the materials being soldered, and the geometry of the solderable surfaces.
Why does wetting to a copper surface usually need to be promoted by the use of a flux?
Several terms are used to refer to the state of the solid surface after a solder operation, when molten solder has covered the surface and is then drained off.
The surface becomes uncovered again, without any visible interaction with the solder. Non-wetting occurs if the oxide film on the basis material is too thick to be removed by the flux applied, within the available time (Figure 3).
A layer of solder is retained, proving that metallic interaction has taken place. Perfect wetting shows a uniform smooth, unbroken and adherent layer of solder to the basis material(Figure 4).
The surface has some regions showing wetting and other regions showing non-wetting. This should not be confused with cases in which part of the solder remains fixed simply because it did not flow off sufficiently, but can in most cases be peeled off. The contact angle provides evidence of real wetting at the boundaries of the wetted regions (Figure 5).
The surface is initially wetted, but the solder then withdraws from part of the surface, typically resulting in a combination of dewetted regions and irregularly shaped solder droplets. Quantitative assessment is difficult, because the boundaries between wetted and dewetted regions are not sharply defined and the dewetting is often unevenly distributed over the surface (Figure 6).
Note that a copper surface retains its colour, but one that has been wetted by solder will never become a clean copper surface again, because a diffusion layer has been formed.
Dewetting is a real problem encountered in soldering. It can affect the quality of soldered joints by reducing the size of the solder fillets on printed boards. In other cases, the component terminations can exhibit dewetting which will also result in poor joints.
Did you notice that the discussion so far was from the perspective of wave soldering? After all it talked about molten solder covering the surface and then ‘draining off’. What do you think might be the differences in wetting behaviour when you are reflowing solder paste, rather than applying liquid solder to the board?
Some parameters are not constant.
[ back to top ]
When a solution solidifies, alloys of metals which have a limited mutual solubility may form new phases at certain ratios. These new phases possess crystal structures different from either component and are called intermetallic compounds. The properties of intermetallics generally differ from those of the component metals, often being less metallic, with reduced density, ductility, and conductivity.
Soldering depends on intermetallic formation because, if intermetallics are formed at the interface, the interfacial energy will be relatively low and wetting will be promoted.
Pure lead does not form intermetallics, but the addition of even a few per cent of tin is enough to form intermetallic compounds and promote wetting on copper. The interface has a Cu3Sn phase next to the copper, followed by a Cu6Sn5 phase, as shown in Figure 7. Tin is depleted by the formation of intermetallics, so there will be a resultant lead-rich region in the solder.
Similarly with nickel-plated surfaces, the contact is between the tin and the nickel, rather than to the base copper foil, and is enhanced by a very thin tin-nickel intermetallic layer. However, this has lower strength than copper-tin intermetallics.
When solder remains in contact with a substrate for long enough at a sufficiently high temperature, there is the potential for intermetallic compounds to continue to form. Although a thin intermetallic layer is necessary to produce wetting, thicker intermetallic layers may alter the appearance of the joint and have an adverse effect on its integrity. Some of the reasons are:
A reduction in the fatigue life of solder also occurs as the joint ages, because of the continuing growth of intermetallic compounds at the joint interfaces (Figure 8).
Source: Klein Wassink, 1994
Your assembler shows you the results of some attempts to increase the throughput of his reflow soldering equipment. You notice that the joints are not as good as they were on boards which underwent a longer soldering cycle. Can you explain why?
Then you catch sight of a board which got stuck in the oven, and was ‘cooked’. Apart from the board being a darker colour, what effect would you expect to see on the joints? And would they be reliable?
[ back to top ]